[Top]
More advice for the full screen mode.
   
Sivut toimivat riittävän hyvin MS IE 4.0+, Opera 5.x+, Netscape 6.0+/ vast. Mozilla ja Konqueror 3.x selaimilla. Yleisesti ottaen sivut toimivat parhaiten uusimmilla Opera selaimilla. Sivujen toimivuus vanhemmissa selaimissa on heikko, erityisesti Netscape 4.x kohdalla.

I list below all topic groups, which I have done according to subjects, which they handle. You can return to this topic group by using this menu and the link Table of topic groups on the top of the each page.
 
 
Search:
[Help]

From pre-HTML until HTML 3.2

First Internet documents were quite simple without just at all presentational features. Those kinds of document can be called as "pre-HTML" documents because they don't have any official specification.

First Web-documents

Look at first Internet documents from the introduction (Document types) of the page Help for HTML All[S].

W3C: HTML Home page[Pw].
Other sites: Dmitry Kirsanov.

Gradually people wanted more and more features, similar to what was available in word processors like Word and WordPerfect. This required additional elements and attributes, which can be seen in HTML 3.2.

In HTML 3.2 all attributes were inside elements and inside of the document BODY, as in previous versions of HTML. Content, structure, and presentations were combined in the same document except for linked images and embedded elements (for example, so-called Java-applets). It was quite easy to build these sorts of documents. The problems lay with static structure and presentation - once such a site has been built, changes made to the site's formatting are difficult to make, especially if there are much elements and attributes, which describe the presentation of documents.

HTML 3.2 lead the usage of HTML into a wrong track. Web authors tried to use HTML as a some kind of layout language, which it is not original designed and which it fits bad. HTML 3.2 was an intermediate solution, which was not intended to be so popular as it became.

Indeed if the site is automatic generated (for example with Java-servlets or Perl) and the content comes from a database, HTML 3.2 works quite well, because a link list needs only one template. It is not however possible to create with HTML 3.2 everything, which can be done with CSS. In most cases it is possible to create less code by using CSS, when pages are rendered faster.

The biggest advance with CSS is handwritten large teaching sites like this site. The second biggest advance is sites, which are partially handwritten and partially automatic generated. Someone can program the automatic generated part, some other person can create the handwritten part and third person can create with CSS the common presentation.

[Top]